• Leg visit notes

    Team 3 (Sehwan) tRanscript

    [edit]Miranda

    Hazel Miranda: And let me just say that the senator’s district… she represents south corridor of Beverly that is Sen Cedillo’s bill

    Sungpyo Ma: Oh ok, so you guys support SB 5067?

    HM: Well I can’t speak for her, but I can only say that she has been in the past a strong supporter of these efforts

    SP: Ok. 지금

    [edit]Trout

    Alana G. Troutt: 67..

    Lee Chul Kyu: I mean.. [what about] Marvyn? (points finger up)

    AT: Oh what does he [stand for]…? Like I said, he is immigrant by himself. (uhuh) So he is always a big supporter of all immigrant issues

    LCK: Oh so he’s on our side.

    AT: Yes, he’s on your side. Yes. (laugh)

    SP: We’ve just had a meeting with the Senator… (Marta) Escutia. And we talked to them abut SB 1267. (uhuh) And they told me that they in the senate side in the appropriate committee, they just passed it, (uhuh) and they are waiting for someone to introduce it in the Assembly side. (yeah) So if he can support this bill…

    AT: Oh, that’s fine, yes. What they need now is for an assembly member to carry it.. read the bill on the floor .. (yes) we call him a jockey (SP laughs)

    SP: SB 160.. (160?) 160, yes. This is gonna be the billl that’ll support the undocumented.. (undocumented students, uhuh) who can’t go, who can’t apply to financial aid and enroll. Right now there is already the AB 540, which will give them in-state tuition, but then… even though they can pay in-state tuition they have to pay everything, they cannot (enroll) yeah enroll, financial aid, scholarships, so this bill has a lot of undocumented immigrants can (apply for.. financial aid) yeah, so if they can support this bill also.

    AT: yeah we’re an “immigrant-friendly office” (great!) [laugh) (alright)

    [edit]Legislative Visits

    • Mark Ridley-Thomas, Assemblyperson
      • Room 3152
      • w/Chief of Staff Vincent Harris
      • Los Angeles County
      • 10:30 AM
      • Phone: 319-2048
    • Denise Moreno DUCHENY
      • 11:30 AM
      • w/Kasey Schimke or other budget person
      • San Diego County
      • Room 4081
      • Phone: 651-4040

    [edit]SB 1267 (Cedillo), 2006

    [1]

    [edit]Bill Summary

    CURRENT BILL STATUS

    • MEASURE : S.B. No. 1267
    • AUTHOR(S) : Cedillo.
    • TOPIC : Office of Immigrant Affairs.
    • HOUSE LOCATION : SEN
    • +LAST AMENDED DATE  : 03/13/2006
    • TYPE OF BILL :
      • Active
      • Non-Urgency
      • Non-Appropriations
      • Majority Vote Required
      • Non-State-Mandated Local Program
      • Fiscal
      • Non-Tax Levy
    • LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 04/24/2006
    • LAST HIST. ACTION  : Placed on APPR. suspense file.
    • COMM. LOCATION : SEN APPROPRIATIONS
    • TITLE : An act to add Section 12087.5 to the Government Code, relating to naturalization services.

    [edit]History

    • Apr. 24 Placed on APPR. suspense file.
    • Apr. 17 From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3517.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    • Apr. 12 Set for hearing April 24.
    • Mar. 20 Set for hearing April 5.
    • Mar. 13 From committee with author’s amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to committee.
    • Feb. 16 To Com. on G.M., E. & A.
    • Feb. 10 From print. May be acted upon on or after March 12.
    • Feb. 9 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    [edit]Bill Text (2/9/06)

    BILL NUMBER: SB 1267 INTRODUCED

    BILL TEXT
    INTRODUCED BY Senator Cedillo

    FEBRUARY 9, 2006

    An act to add Section 12087.5 to the Government Code, relating to naturalization services.
    LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

    SB 1267, as introduced, Cedillo Office of Immigrant Affairs.

    Existing law sets forth the duties of the Department of Community Services and Development respecting certain community programs in the state. Existing law appropriates $1,500,000 to the department for purposes of the Naturalization Services Program.

    This bill would establish within the department the Office of Immigrant Affairs in order to ensure the integration and civic participation of new citizens in the state. The office would be overseen and managed by a director who would administer the Naturalization Services Program and develop a program plan to add components to that program, work with local organizations to ensure the success and availability of services provided through the Naturalization Services Program, and establish an advisory committee to serve as a liaison between the Office of Immigrant Affairs and the immigrant communities of the state.

    • Vote: majority.
    • Appropriation: no.
    • Fiscal committee: yes.
    • State-mandated local program: no.

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    1. SECTION 1.
      1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows:
        1. Immigrants are a vibrant force in California’s changing demographics. More than one-quarter of California residents are foreign born. Of the 8.8 million foreign born, 39 percent are United States citizens and 3.3 million are legal permanent residents.
        2. Most noncitizens have family members who are citizens. Ninety percent of Latinos and 80 percent of Asians live in households with citizens.
        3. Approximately 40 percent of Californians speak a language other than English at home.
        4. Fifty-five percent of California’s immigrants come from Latin America, while 33 percent come from Asia, 8 percent from Europe, 2 percent from North America, and the rest from Africa and Oceania.
        5. Immigrants fuel California’s economy through their labor and entrepreneurship. Immigrants comprise one-third of California’s labor force in key economic sectors: 40 percent in general services, 45 percent in manufacturing, and 33 percent work in a variety of sectors. Sixty-six percent of gardeners are immigrants. Sixty-six percent of cooks are immigrants. Sixty-six percent of domestic workers are immigrants. Ninety percent of farm workers are immigrants.
        6. Immigrants are among California’s most productive entrepreneurs and have created jobs for tens of thousands of Californians. In San Jose alone, immigrant owners of technology companies created more than 58,000 jobs and generated more than $17 billion in sales during the 1990s.
        7. Immigrants will represent a significant proportion of California’s voters in years to come. In California, there are currently 2.7 million immigrants eligible to naturalize and several million more that will soon become eligible to naturalize. This will increase the number of voters who are naturalized citizens in the years to come.
        8. California has at least 85 cities where noncitizen adults comprise more than 25 percent of the city’s total voting-age population. There are 30 municipalities where noncitizen adults make up more than 40 percent of the voting-age population.
        9. Immigrants often require the most assistance immediately upon arrival to the United States. However, as immigrants reside in the state for a longer period of time, they are less likely to use services and more likely to contribute to the state’s culture and economy.
        10. It is in the best interest of the state and its residents to establish an Office of Immigrant Affairs for state government to advocate and promote cooperation and understanding between government agencies and immigrant residents, and to assist immigrants toward naturalization.
        11. Citizenship and civic participation among all California residents is vital to the economic and societal well-being of the state.
        12. It is the state’s responsibility to help its immigrant population integrate in society, develop a sense of belonging, and seize opportunities for success in order to ensure equal opportunity for a high quality of life of every resident.
        13. California’s primary goal should be to support the ability of all residents, including immigrants to be economically self-sufficient, participate in our nation’s and state political process, and foster a sense of responsibility to our community.
        14. It is the intent of the Legislature that the Office of Immigrant Affairs ensure state government agencies and California communities are aware of the needs of immigrants and that immigrants receive appropriate assistance to quickly achieve and maintain self-reliance and full integration into our society.
    2. SEC. 2. Section 12087.5 is added to the Government Code, to read: 12087.5.
      1. There is hereby established the Office of Immigrant Affairs within the Department of Community Service and Development. In order to ensure the integration and civic participation of new citizens in the state, the office shall do all of the following:
        1. Address the needs of immigrant communities by setting objectives and deliverables, and partnering with state government agencies to provide outreach and services to the ethnic communities.
        2. Work with state agencies and departments to identify resources and programs that can be used by immigrant residents to assist their assimilation, including, but not limited to, education, adult education, language skills, civics, job training, consumer protection, housing, domestic violence, health, and naturalization services.
        3. Conduct data-driven policy analysis on issues impacting immigrant communities.
        4. Develop strategies, program proposals, and goals that support the ability of new citizens to be economically self-sufficient, participate in governance, and foster a sense of belonging and responsibility to the community.
        5. Provide services and information to help new citizens learn English, be informed of our laws and support public safety, know their rights, be responsible family members, engage in civic affairs, and maximize their contributions to ensure a high quality of life in our community.
        6. Work with educational institutions, community-based organizations, nonprofits, and private programs to develop a civics curriculum for people participating in the Naturalization Services Program.
        7. Serve as a clearinghouse to help new citizens and eligible immigrants for the naturalization process access translated information on resources available in the state. Also, distribute information on adult education, English literacy, civic education, and citizenship services offered by local organizations.
      2. The office shall be overseen and managed by a director to be appointed by the department.
      3. The director of the office shall do all of the following:
        1. Administer the Naturalization Services Program and develop a program plan to add components to that program to allow it to cater to the needs of California’s immigrant population more efficiently and effectively in the areas of naturalization and civic participation.
        2. Work with local organizations to ensure the success and availability of services provided through the Naturalization Services Program.
        3. Establish an advisory committee to serve as a liaison between the Office of Immigrant Affairs and the immigrant communities of the state.
      4. The advisory committee shall do all of the following:
        1. Along with the Director of the Office of Immigrant Affairs, gather information about the needs of California’s immigrant population, determine key state governmental resources used by immigrant communities, identify key policy areas and areas of concern and report findings with recommendations to the state as to how it can respond to the issues impacting California’s immigrant population.
        2. Help the office create a strategy to promote public awareness of the contributions of immigrants and how immigration can support community goals.
        3. Identify ways to define and measure immigrant integration and self-reliance and report progress to policymakers and the public. The advisory committee shall work to identify ways to improve the naturalization process and immigration services.

    [edit]Bill Analysis (4/7/06)

    Hearing Date:April 5, 2006 |Bill No:SB | | |1267 |

    SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT MODERNIZATION, EFFICIENCY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY Senator Liz Figueroa, Chair

    Bill No: SB 1267 Author: Cedillo As Amended: March 13, 2006 Fiscal:Yes

    SUBJECT: Office of Immigrant Affairs

    SUMMARY: Establishes the Office of Immigrant Affairs within the Department of Community Services and Development, and charges the Office with various duties related to the integration and civic participation of immigrant communities.

    [edit]Existing law:

    1. Requires secondary adult education and community college programs to provide citizenship education services and describes outreach programs and services for eligible immigrants.
    2. Establishes the Department of Community Services and Development, and charges this Department with providing technical assistance to community action agencies, Indian tribes, and other agencies that operate programs of an anti-poverty nature.

    [edit]This bill:

    1. Establishes the Office of Immigrant Affairs (Office) within the Department of Community Service and Development (DCSD).
    2. Requires the Office, in order to ensure the integration and civic participation of new citizens in the state, to do all of the following:
      1. Address the needs of immigrant communities by setting objectives and deliverables, and partnering with state government agencies to provide outreach and services to the ethnic communities;
      2. Work with state agencies and departments to identify resources and programs that can be used by immigrant residents to assist their integration, including, but not limited to, education, adult education, language skills, civics, job training, consumer protection, housing, domestic violence, health, and naturalization services;
      3. Conduct data-driven policy analysis on issues impacting immigrant communities;
      4. Develop strategies, program proposals, and goals that support the ability of new citizens to be economically self-sufficient, participate in governance, and foster a sense of belonging and responsibility to the community;
      5. Provide services and information to help new citizens learn English, be informed of our laws and support public safety, know their rights, be responsible family members, engage in civic affairs, and maximize their contributions to ensure a high quality of life in our community;
      6. Work with educational institutions, community-based organizations, nonprofits, and private programs to develop a civics curriculum for people participating in the Naturalization Services Program; and,
      7. Serve as a clearinghouse to help new citizens and eligible immigrants for the naturalization process access translated information on resources available in the state, and to also distribute information on adult education, English literacy, civic education, and citizenship services offered by local organizations.
    3. Requires the Office to be overseen and managed by a director to be appointed by DCSD.
    4. Requires the director of the Office to do all of the following:
      1. Administer the Naturalization Services Program and develop a program plan to add components to that program to allow it to cater to the needs of California’s immigrant population more efficiently and effectively in the areas of naturalization and civic participation;
      2. Work with local organizations to ensure the success and availability of services provided through the Naturalization Services Program; and,
      3. Establish an advisory committee to serve as a liaison between the Office and immigrant communities of the state. Requires the advisory committee to identify key areas of concern and report findings with recommendations to the state as to how it can respond to the issues, help the Office create a strategy to promote public awareness of the contributions of immigrants, and identify ways to measure immigrant integrations and self-reliance and report progress to policymakers.
    5. Makes the following uncodified legislative findings and declarations:
      1. Immigrants are a vibrant force in California’s changing demographics. More than one-quarter of California residents are foreign born. Of the 8.8 million foreign born, 39 percent are United States citizens and 3.3 million are legal permanent residents;
      2. Most noncitizens have family members who are citizens. Ninety percent of Latinos and 80 percent of Asians live in households with citizens;
      3. Approximately 40 percent of Californians speak a language other than English at home;
      4. Fifty-five percent of California’s immigrants come from Latin America, while 33 percent come from Asia, 8 percent from Europe, 2 percent from North America, and the rest from Africa and Oceania;
      5. Immigrants fuel California’s economy through their labor and entrepreneurship. Immigrants comprise one-third of California’s labor force in key economic sectors: 40 percent in general services, 45 percent in manufacturing, and 33 percent work in a variety of sectors. Sixty-six percent of gardeners are immigrants. Sixty-six percent of cooks are immigrants. Sixty-six percent of domestic workers are immigrants. Ninety percent of farm workers are immigrants;
      6. Immigrants are among California’s most productive entrepreneurs and have created jobs for tens of thousands of Californians. In San Jose alone, immigrant owners of technology companies created more than 58,000 jobs and generated more than $17 billion in sales during the 1990s;
      7. Immigrants will represent a significant proportion of California’s voters in years to come. In California, there are currently 2.7 million immigrants eligible to naturalize and several million more that will soon become eligible to naturalize. This will increase the number of voters who are naturalized citizens in the years to come;
      8. California has at least 85 cities where noncitizen adults comprise more than 25 percent of the city’s total voting-age population. There are 30 municipalities where noncitizen adults make up more than 40 percent of the voting-age population;
      9. Immigrants often require the most assistance immediately upon arrival to the United States. However, as immigrants reside in the state for a longer period of time, they are less likely to use services and more likely to contribute to the state’s culture and economy;
      10. It is in the best interest of the state and its residents to establish an Office of Immigrant Affairs for state government to advocate and promote cooperation and understanding between government agencies and immigrant residents, and to assist immigrants toward naturalization;
        1. Citizenship and civic participation among all California residents is vital to the economic and societal well-being of the state;
        2. It is the state’s responsibility to help its immigrant population integrate in society, develop a sense of belonging, and seize opportunities for success in order to ensure equal opportunity for a high quality of life of every resident; and,
        3. California’s primary goal should be to support the ability of all residents, including immigrants to be economically self-sufficient, participate in our nation’s and state political process, and foster a sense of responsibility to our community.
    6. States the intent of the Legislature that the Office ensure state government agencies and California communities are aware of the needs of immigrants and that immigrants receive appropriate assistance to quickly achieve and maintain self-reliance and full integration into our society.

    FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown

    [edit]COMMENTS:

    [edit]Purpose

    According to the author, this bill is sponsored by the California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative, and is based on the Office of Ethnic Affairs in the State of Utah.

    The author states that in California, there are currently 2.7 million immigrants eligible to naturalize and several million more that will soon become eligible to naturalize. This will increase the number of voters who are naturalized citizens in the years to come. The author points out that California has at least 85 cities where non-citizen adults comprise more than 25% of the city’s total voting-age population, including 30 municipalities where non-citizen adults make up more than 40% of the voting-age population. The author asserts that Citizenship and civic participation among all California residents is vital to the economic and societal well being of the state.

    The author argues that given these statistics, California’s governance structure lacks an office responsible for helping California’s immigrant population integrate in society, develop a sense of belonging, and seize opportunities for success in order to ensure equal opportunity for a high quality of life for every resident.

    According to the author, it is in the best interest of the State of California and its citizens to establish an Office of Immigrant Affairs for state government to advocate and promote cooperation and understanding between government agencies and immigrant citizens, and to assist immigrants toward naturalization.

    [edit]Naturalization Services Program

    Although it has never been codified in statute, for more than 8 years, DCSD has operated a Naturalization Services Program that has been funded by the state budget. According to DCSD, “the Naturalization Services Program is a State funded program that assists legal permanent residents in obtaining citizenship. Services include outreach, intake and assessment, citizenship application assistance, citizenship testing and interview preparation, and coordination with and referral to other naturalization organizations.

    The Naturalization Services Program was funded at $1.5 million in the current fiscal year, and the Governor’s Proposed Budget maintains this level of funding for the 2006-07 fiscal year.

    [edit]Arguments in Support

    The California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative (CIWC), the sponsor of this bill, states that it is a statewide partnership of four immigrant rights organizations: the Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, the National Immigration Law Center, and the Services, Immigrant Rights and Education Network.

    CIWC states in support that as home to the largest immigrant population in the country, it is critical for California to show leadership in implementing model policies for integrating newcomers into our state. CIWC argues that access to citizenship services, support programs, and civic participation opportunities are key components of successfully integrating immigrant families into our state’s social, political, and civic fabric.

    Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality (AACRE) states in support that Asian Pacific Americans represent 14 percent of California’s population, and that among adults age 18 and older, 78 percent of Asians are foreign-born, and a majority of these individuals are naturalized citizens. AACRE supports this bill in order to provide key components to successfully integrate families into our state’s social, political and civic fabric.

    The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) states in support that although immigrants are eager to fully participate in all aspects of American life, many lack the appropriate tools or information to do so. MALDEF states that this bill would address the needs of immigrant communities and provide culturally appropriate outreach and services that assist and support new immigrants towards naturalization.

    The California Partnership supports this bill, stating that California’s changing demographics point to the necessity for an Office of Immigrant Affairs that builds upon the strengths of immigrants and their families and expedites their journey towards self-sufficiency.

    The California Landscape Contractors Association also supports this bill, stating that if Congress enacts a comprehensive immigration reform bill, it is essential that state governments step up to assist with the naturalization of undocumented workers who qualify, and that this bill is a good beginning.

    [edit]Related Legislation

    AB 2060 (De La Torre), pending in the Assembly, proposes to codify the Naturalization Services Program, and would also require regional collaboration among the grantees that receive the money, add a civic participation and leadership component to the program and create an advisory board.

    [edit]SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:

    Support:

    California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative (sponsor) American Muslim Voice Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality Asian American Legal Center of Southern California Asian Law Alliance California Church Impact California Landscape Contractors Association California Partnership Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area Community Resource Project, Inc. Diocese of San Jose Filipino American Service Group, Inc. General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 890 L.A. Union Law Center for Families Mayfair Improvement Initiative Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund TODEC Legal Center UNITE HERE Local 11 Worksite Wellness Los Angeles

    Opposition:

    None on file

    Consultant:Vincent D. Marchand

    [edit]4/5/06 Vote

    MOTION: Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. (AYES 3. NOES 2.) (PASS)

    • AYES:
      • Figueroa
      • Ducheny
      • Kuehl
    • NOES
      • Ackerman
      • Ashburn

    [edit]Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary (4/26/06)

    Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary

    Senator Kevin Murray, Chairman
    1267 (Cedillo)
    • Hearing Date: 4/24/2006
    • Amended: 3/13/2006
    • Consultant: John Miller
    • Policy Vote: Gov. Accountability
    • 3 – 2

    BILL SUMMARY: Establishes the Office of Immigrant Affairs within the Department of Community Services and Development and charges the Office with duties related to the integration and civic participation of immigrant communities.

    Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

    Major Provisions 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Fund
    Program support $ 1,700 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 GF

    STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to Suspense.

    This measure creates the Office of Immigrant Affairs (Office) within the Department of Community Services and Development to insure the integration and civic participation of new citizens in the state. The new Office would provide outreach and services to ethnic communities; work with state agencies to identify resources to assist immigrant residents access education, language skills, job training, health and naturalization services. The Office would serve as a clearing house for information to help new citizens and eligible immigrants become independent and participate in civic affairs and would assist in the operation of the existing Naturalization Services Program.

    California currently provides $1.5 million for support of the Naturalization Services Program which assists legal immigrants become citizens through services like those proposed in this bill. A similar measure, AB 2060 (De La Torre), has been determined to cost approximately $3.5 million. Administrative costs are expected to total $500,000. There are currently 2.5 million immigrants in California eligible for naturalization.

    [edit]4/24/06 Vote

    MOTION: Placed on Appropriations Suspense file. (AYES 11. NOES 0.) (PASS)

    • AYES
      • Murray
      • Alarcon
      • Alquist
      • Ashburn
      • Battin
      • Dutton
      • Escutia
      • Florez
      • Ortiz
      • Romero
      • Torlakson
    • NOES
    • ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
      • Aanestad
      • Poochigian

  • (more…)


  • PDF: http://yokim.net/wiki/Image:AB_813_Nunez_to_Advocates.pdf

    Sacramento Office
    1107 Ninth Street, Suite 801
    Sacramento, California 95814
    Telephone: 916/442-0753; FAX 916/442-7966
    www.wclp.org

    [Tags]medicare, medicare part d, prescription drug, medi-medi, dual eligible, emergency measure, california, legislature, law, medi-cal[/Tags]

    Continuation of Emergency Coverage
    Medicare Part D – Update
    May 11, 2006

    AB 813 Nunez/Perata

    Current state emergency coverage for Medicare Part D failures pursuant to SB 1233 (Perata) will expire on May 16, 2006. Without continuing some state remedy for Medicare Part D problems, some of the most vulnerable persons in the state would be left without prescription drugs when Part D occurred.

    AB 813 (Perata/Nunez) as amended May 9, 2006, appropriates $120 million to continue emergency coverage for prescription drugs through the State’s Medi-Cal program from May 17, 2006 through January 31, 2007 for individuals who have both Medicaid and Medicare coverage (dual eligibles).

    AB 813 has been fast-tracked through the legislature. It was heard in the Senate Health Committee May 10, 2006. On May 11, 2006, the Senate Appropriations Committee passed the bill to the Senate floor where it received the required two-thirds vote to pas the Senate. AB 813 will be heard on the Assembly floor Monday May 15, 2006 where it is expected to pass and then sent to the Governor for signing before expiration of current emergency coverage on May 16, 2006.
    (more…)


  • CHIRLA just went from the old plain HTML

    chirla 012905

    to this: (CivicSpace powered).

    chirla 050806

    Someone in the staff is very, very adventurous.

    [Tags]civicspace, website design, content management software[/Tags]


  • Before hitting Wilshire and Western at 4:00 pm, we are sitting in the lounge watching Fox News, which is broadcasting live rallies in Downtown and Santa Ana. That looks pretty hard to match up. Then we think of our plan for today.

    Ever heard CNN’s of live Gulf War broadcasting? Iraqui scud missile headquarters used CNN screens to fine-tune their targets.

    [Tags]immigration, immigrant, protests, rally, may day, may 1, los angeles, california[/Tags]


  • Government Sued over Failure to Implement Medicare Drug Law’s Protections for Low-Income People: Challenge Brought on Behalf of More than 6 Million Recipients

    Oakland, CA; April 26, 2006–A class action complaint was filed today in the U.S. Federal District Court, Northern District of California to force the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ensure that the 6.4 million seniors and disabled individuals across the nation who receive both Medicare and Medicaid (“dual eligibles”) have effective, timely access to prescription medication under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug program.

    (more…)


  • Ana put footnotes in Mac’s April 10 Immigrant Rights March flyer. omg.

    mn saint paul april 10 march.png

    Compare with Berkeley’s flyer.

    [Tags]Immigration, Agitprop, Humor[/Tags]


  • How to do it

    1. decide on at least 2 street segments you will be postering on
      • suggested street segments are already posted at the sign-up sheet below, waiting for takers
      • for postering purposes, a city (glendale, cerritos, northridge, torrance) counts as 1/2 street segment (see the K-Town markets excel sheet for markets outside K-Town.) We will most likely go to the cities for flyering instead of postering, so hold of from going to cities just for postering.
    2. decide on time
      • Because our targets include restaurants, it may be more effective to schedule your postering around 9:00-10:00am or 2:00-3:00pm (dodge pre-meal rush hour)
    3. arrange your own transportation – talk directly to a car person etc
    4. write what you chose at the present web sign-up sheet
      1. click blue “edit” link in the desired date square and
      2. write your name and time next to street segment
      3. click “save page”
    5. grab agitprop stock
      • you should find them in two boxes and a big paper envelope next to the desk between MJ and Irene’s office.
      • Take at least 20 KL / 5 SL / 5 EL flyers per street segment. Don’t flyer them, but have them handy in case passersby request it from you.
    6. go postering
      • Get a clipboard where you will write:
        1. how many flyers/posters were handed out, with a language breakdown
        2. names and addresses of businesses that requested the poster to be removed after event.
      • Try to do most business complexes (located at major street corners). but if the street being intersected is already covered by another street segment (i.e. 8th and Western, Olympic and Vermont) do one every two business complexes you encounter.
    7. report back
      • come back and write how many flyers & posters were handed out (with a language breakdown) next to your name in the web signup sheet
      • record names and businesses that requested post-event poster removal
      • return remainder to agitprop stock

    지시 사항

    1. 포스터를 붙일 구역 최소한 2개 결정
      • 권장 구역은 하단 sign-up sheet 에 붙어있음
      • LA County 의 도시 (cerritos, glendale, torrance, northridge 등)에 포스터를 붙이러 갈 경우 이는 1/2 구역으로 계산됨. 관련하여 한인 마켓 excel sheet 참고할것. 나중에 이곳으로 전단지 뿌리러 갈터이니 되도록이면 가지 말것.
    2. 시간 결정
      • 식당 영업을 고려해 점심/저녁 시간을 제외하는 것이 유리
    3. 교통 수단 확보
    4. 결정 내용을 이 웹 sign-up sheet 에 기록
      1. 날짜마다 붙어있는 파란색 “[edit]” 링크를 클릭
      2. 구역 옆에 이름과 시간 기록
      3. “Save page” 클릭
    5. 선전선동물 확보
      • 명주/방원씨 사이에 있는 책상 옆에 있음
      • 구역 별로 최소한 20우리말/5개 스페인어/5개 영어의 전단지 (포스터 말고) 준비. 뿌릴 필요는 없으나 포스터 붙이는 도중 누가 이를 요청할 경우 주면 됨
    6. 포스터 붙이기
      • 클립 보드를 준비하여 다음을 기록
        1. 언어별로 몇개 붙엿는지, 전단지 몇개 뿌렸는지
        2. 행사 끝난 후 포스터 떼어줄것을 요청한 비즈니스 주소와 이름
      • 비즈니스 복합건물을 할 것. 다른 구역과 교차하는 교차로일 경우 (예: 8th & Western 등) 2개마다 1개 구역에 포스터 붙일 것
    7. 보고
      • 언어별로 몇개 붙엿는지 웹에 자신의 이름 옆에 기록할것
      • 포스터 제거 요청한 비즈니스 주소와 이름 여기다 기록
      • 남은 선전선동물은 stock 으로 되돌릴 것

    Thur 3/16

    • Poster & Flyer Drop-Off: Irene 11:30am-12:00pm
    • Poster & Flyer Pickup: Shannon 1:30-2:00pm
    • KIWA Korean History Group: Yongho – Outcome: 8 Flyers (5K 2E 1S), 3 Posters (2K 1S)

    Fri 3/17

    • Wilshire Bl, North Side (Hobart-Vermont) : Sehwan 15:00-17:00
    • Wilshire Bl, South Side (Hobart-Vermont) : Sehwan 15:00-17:00 visited 10 office buildings, 0 posters

    Sat 3/18

    • BRU Mtg/Anti-War Rally: Yongho 11:00am-3:00pm. Outcome: 30 E/S flyers
    • Glendale: Shannon

    Sun 3/19

    • Church: Yongho 25 K flyers, 1 EP 1KP

    Mon 3/20

    • Wilshire Bl, North Side, Wilton-Hobart YK 2:00-3:15pm
    • Wilshire Bl, North Side, Hobart-Vermont : YK 3:15-4:00pm
    • Wilshire Bl, South Side, Western-Wilton YK 4:00-4:30pm
      outcome: Flyers: 27 E/K, 6 S/E, Posters: 12K
    • Wilshire Bl, North Side, Wilton-Western: SH 2:00-2:15pm
    • Wilshire Bl, South Side, Western-Vermont : SH 2:15-4:00pm
      outcome: posters : (6K), flyers : (6k-e, 6k)
    • Western Ave, East Side (Beverly-Wilshire): SP & SH 5:45-7:15pm
    • Western Ave, West Side (Beverly-Wilshire): SP & SH 5:45-7:15pm
      outcome: 30-40 poster
    • Olympic Ave, Western-Irolo, North Side: JC & TY 5:45-7:15pm
    • Olympic Ave, Western-Irolo, South Side: JC & TY 5:45-7:15pm
      outcome: 40 posters
    • Olympic Ave, Irolo-Vermont, North Side: YM & MH 5:45-7:15pm
    • Olympic Ave, Irolo-Vermont, South Side: YM & MH 5:45-7:15pm
      outcome: Flyer: 11S, 14E, 30K. Poster: 9K, 1S (23 places, 3 bus stops, 13 hand outs)
    • Western Ave, Wilshire-Olympic, East Side: JC& TY
    • Western Ave, Wilshire-Olympic, West Side: JC & TY
    • Sunset and Alvarado: Shannon (2 Asian Markets)
      will do both flyering and postering
    • 8th St, Western-Normandie/Irolo, north & south:
    • 8th St, South Side, Irolo-Vermont:
    • Olympic Ave, North Side (Crenshaw-Western) YM
    • Olympic Ave, South Side (Crenshaw-Western) YM
    • Vermont Ave, East Side (Wilshire-Olympic)
    • Vermont Ave, West Side (Wilshire-Olympic)
    • Torrance/Gardena:
    • Cerritos/Norwalk:

  • Leavitt says that Medicare Part D was a success because “Around 90 percent of Medicare beneficiaries have enrolled” (DHHS Press Release, 4/4/06) to Part D. This statement is repeated in his Three-Month Progress Report (PDF)

    “[Seniors] have enrolled” is not the exact phrasing I would use. “[Seniors] have been enrolled” is more accurate. Let’s take a quick look at the numbers.

    http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=p_DwZ2rHBsQirV7FyDb4RBQ&hl=en

    Source: CMS (web link and direct link to Total Medicare Beneficiaries with Drug Coverage Data (v04.18.06) [Excel.zip, 3KB], Kaiser has a web version of the numbers

    Leavitt includes all kinds of non-voluntary enrollment, and even non-enrollment information into his 27 million figure.

    1. First, 30 million is 69% of total Medicare beneficiaries, not 90%.
    2. Second, 10 million seniors/disabled out of these 30 million have not enrolled to Part D at all. They have had drug coverage all along (Already w/Creditable Coverage), and they should not be included in a report that measures CMS’s success in implementing Medicare Part D. They are beneficiaries to the Employer Retiree Drug Subsidy (RDS) and Federal FEHB and TRICARE programs.
    3. Third, you can’t attribute “Automatic Enrollment” numbers to CMS’s merits. There’s two subcategories, so let’s take a closer look:
      • Medicare-Medical Dual Eligibles: these are low-income seniors/disabled who were forcibly enrolled to Part D in January 1 2006, and went through all sorts of hardships while coping with the insurance companies’ neglect towards them. MediCaid sent them a NOA in late 2005 telling them that their MediCaid prescription drug benefits were being terminated, and Medicare just enrolled them to a randomly selected plan in December 31, 2005. Yes. RANDOM. Formulary and Pharmacy Network hell ensued.
      • Medicare Advantage (HMO, Part C): they were also forcibly enrolled to an HMO-subsidiary PDP from their own HMO by January 1, 2006. They can’t opt out for another plan, because then they lose their entire HMO benefit. They never filled a form requesting Medicare Part D. How can you call that “the senior enrolled”?
    4. Therefore 43 million should not be the 100% standard for counting enrollees, because 20 million out of those either do not have to enroll to Part D (and indeed they haven’t) or cannot enroll to it because they have been enrolled forcibly. The 100% goal should be 21 million
    5. And out of those, only 8 million have enrolled to this date. That’s why CBOs and CMS are scrambling to get the remaining 13 million enrolled before the May 15 2006 deadline.

    Let’s stand corrected. The real enrollment of seniors/disabled who chose to enroll to Medicare Part D because they looked at their options and made a rational choice (a capitalist economy ideal, no?) is 8 million out of 21 million, which is a whoopping 38%. Not 90%.

    [Tags]Medicare, Medicare Part D, Prescription Drug Plan, Enrollment, Numbers, Statistics, DHHS[/Tags]


  • Consider this a front-line ethnographic report on translator-original text producer split of a phenomenon that also occurs in the programming front with i18n’s

    when you step down from the MTA bus, you can see at the exit a sign that reads

    Wait for green light, then step down

    and also right below it

    Espere por la luz verde antes de pisar abajo

    Which is translated wrong. It should say “antes de bajarse” (“before getting out of the bus”, not “bejore standing under” – under what?). This problem, though, is way too easy to spot, and it’s unlikely that this glitch is the translator’s fault (such as the other more common ad mistakes which employ the wrong verb conjugation or an inconsistent usted/tu word play).

    Most likely MTA had hired a single interpreter to do jobs in a batch process to save costs, and the translator was isolated from the actual material setting where the interaction betwen sign and reader was taking place – thus was completely unaware of what “stepping down” implied. (It’s fairly obvious once you see the actual stairs that lead you to the back door of the bus, but not if the translator is sitting at the office typing in a Word document at 11pm)

    Some bureaucrats will never comprehend this, however.


  • Two and half years ago, our ethnographic interviewing methods professor walked us through what was to come, towards the end of the semester:

    … What other classes your could take to complement ours? Hmm, I’d say, take statistics. No! Don’t take it here. No need to waste your tuition dollars on an introductory math course. Take a summer course at your community college. With the training you all have had this semester, you are all set up for graduate level research (or in a commercial setting), and usually they’d require you to have an M.A. to back it up, but a Masters is too expensive, not quite worth it, and you have the skills now.. so just get one or two years doing more field research, and get that stats course done. You won’t *actually* be doing any stats though, there will be experts with Ph.D. in stats doing the actual analysis. They won’t let you touch the database, they are very picky and don’t trust anyone else… If you don’t stay alert, you might forever staying behind the clipboard and asking “so did you mean ‘a lot’ or ‘lot’?”. How to get out of that cycle.. hmm (typical S smile), you figure it out.

    I think we’ve got the Ph.D. in question. I’m glad we’ve got one though.


  • This stuff doesn’t show up on their website anymore nor the Internet Archive, but it’s still on google cache.

    Senate approves nomination of Mark McClellan for CMS administrator

    (more…)


  • I got an email on the Report Back from the LA delegation to WTO on Jan18. Check out WTO, Food and Dirt, Hong Kong and Koreans from the US, a blog apparently run by several people, including some from the LA delegation. The PDF flier attached to the original email is here.

    (more…)


  • despite how much i hate liberals, this is … satisfying

    facebook pulse.png


  • (22:16:58) Yongho_Kim: y tú, qué onda? cómo anda el invierno en stgo?
    (22:17:04) Yongho_Kim: ah verda el verano
    (22:17:14) Vicheaux: invierno mis polainas, estamos comenzando el verano
    (22:17:20) Vicheaux: 😉
    (22:17:24) Vicheaux: caluroso lamentablemente
    (22:18:22) Yongho_Kim: y cómo se copan uds? y tú vicheaux?
    (22:18:33) Vicheaux: copan?
    (22:19:00) Yongho_Kim: copan con el calor..
    (22:19:05) Yongho_Kim: oink
    (22:19:22) Yongho_Kim: cómo equivan el calor, cachai
    (22:20:05) Vicheaux: jeje
    (22:20:17) Vicheaux: ahora te cacho


  • WordPress 2 (the pseudo official version.. not RC, available under /downloads, but unannounced as of yet under /blog ) bugs/malfunctionings found so far:

    1. When clicking previously saved draft posts, the screen moves automatically to /text/?p=POSTID which obviously doesn’t exist yet, and so it shows an error message.
    2. The new permalinks structure (neat small .htaccess!) seems to be unable to process nested categories as independent categories. Previously, all /de /en /cr /es , all nests of /a (as in ( /c/a/en ) were accessible at /c/en , which now returns There is no “” category (which is funny, as it should at the least show “there is no “en” category”) but they are now only accessible under the logically correct (/c/a/en ) category permalink.

  • Approximately 8,000 koreans gathered in Crenshaw Christian Center Faith Dome (scroll left) in an event called LA Holy City Convention 2005 (성시화 대회) during October 7-9 under the catchphrases “Whole Church, Whole Gospel, Whole LA!”, “Love Jesus Love LA!” etc. The dome’s capacity is 15,000, which I heard was the original aim of the convention.

    It’s basically an evangelization drive, from how people are portraying it. It was three days of regular worship in korean language, and from what I see in their schedule, the special gatherings for pastors and college students, respectively, have seminar/workshop components on past work and what actions to actually take. I only went to their Friday worship, which was the first night.

    Participants had to sign up beforehand, and apparently there was an admissions fee – which apparently was paid for by our church for the five of us who went there. Staff youth were checking each individual for passes at the entrance of the dome and giving out the schedule, a glossy paper 27-page introduction to the purpose of the drive and schedule for the 3 days. The friday worship overlapped with the young adults (청년) worship, so that’s the group that went.

    In a video presentation, sponsoring parties introduced basic concepts and past work under a similar concept. Strangely, 이명박’s giving Seoul to God was not mentioned as part of the overarching movement of 성시화 (did his work also get a bad reception in the christian community?), but 춘천 (1974? was that right?) and 포항 in 2004 were presented as cases of successful 성시화 evangelization drives. The historic model was Calvin’s mayoral ruling in Genova.

    In discussing the work of 성시화 in 포항, presenters used the word “공장 노동자”. Usually 박정희 supporters prefer the term 근로자, “hard worker”, so that was strange. They also showed some 달동네 scenes from the city, I don’t know what the purpose of that may have been.

    The rationale for the need of such a drive was the spread of “crime”, “tatoos” and “drugs” in the community. Presenters emphasized that such strongholds of christianity as LA, which produced the great envangelizers Billy Graham and Bill Wright (CCC), could not cross arms and sit back when there was a need for God.

    Someone else also said that the US was the new Rome of the world, and that Rome was the center of classic meditarranean multiculturalism, peoples from many races and lands coming together, which was won over by christians and the fact of Rome as an imperial power became an advantage for christianity. Since there is an english hegemony in the world, where people are pushed to learn it as a matter of remains of colonialism, economic survival, or social arribismo, koreans in LA were in a comfortable position to make use of that position and start evangelizing. There was also mention of doing media work with newspapers.

    There was a mention of praying for that korean congressman who was involved in the 폭탄주 사건. Little Arnold and Antonio Villaraigoza were present in the worship, and even some black folks, and they were given headphones by the event staff. Generally it was not very accessible for english speakers, though.

    One way of introducing the relevance of this to the context of LA was that LA was “Los Angels” and that it meant to be the city of angels -_- which historically incorrect. The main noun in the original city name was “pueblo” (village) – “Village of Our Lady the Queen of Angels at the Porciúncula River”.

    All income generated during the convention was to be spent in future evangelizing work, as well as establishment of church-sponsored scholarships for latino and black students.

    During the worship, this was how people were arranged. Generally, there was a lack of attendants in churches located in white suburbia.


  • I often try to avoid recognition/downplay their weight, in reaction to how much generally (older) people I know seem to have come to cherish recognition to the level of fetish.

    When the OITs gave the BRU campaign award, I realized that despite my efforts, recognition was successful in stirring my emotions (ie: I couldn’t control my face expressions), which could become problematic in later, smaller meetings. So maybe it’s better for my long-term growth to just admit that I have a person/al part that desires recognition and accept/enjoy recognition when coming from our side of the trench. Repressed desires can become a major vulnerability, esp. if outsiders find out.

    So enjoying recognition may be a viable tactic (short-term plan) with the ultimate goal of preserving a stable/immune personality.

    Similarly, I may sometimes get swayed more easily by political touting, because I chose to not identify as anything ethnic. (I don’t have a problem with labeling myself with the biological/political “asian”) In other words, there may be psychological grounds for which I started name-dropping with people, who partially got the point that I am prone to an environment of confabulation. My intellectual background is weak in anything beyond non/lean-ideological direct action, so it works a lot more in the direction of “oh, you are red too! ho ho!” than an actual discussion.

    Because I have more grounds to start with (cultural and racial) when I pick up “korean”, and won’t feel as insecure with even something like “activist”, I may be taking the right steps towards making myself less vulnerable to ideological play. I mean, as long as I can swallow all or part of the nationalistic bullshit that comes along. (It’s faster to take part of it for granted, than to trying to prove wrong to those who claim I’m not “korean” because I don’t do X or believe Y) . Which path, it doesn’t really matter.

    Because after being in the field a few years, I’ll drop the korean; that’s why it’s (personally) tactical.

    But naturally I won’t be the same person a few years from now.


  • So on channel USA (DirecTV #242), Leptoprin (obesity pills) ads claim that this is a “USA-patent backed product”.

    Now, a patent can’t “back” a drug. The FDA “backs” (approves/proves) drugs. All a patent does is assuring the pharmaceutical corporation has exclusive rights over the drug as an intellectual property. You can’t get away that easy, na na.


  • sticking around a house with no heating in the middle of LA winter may be the shortcut to tuberculosis. it’s in my best interests to run away to my uncle’s. soon.